Welcome to the Giving Circles BLOG!
Come share with Giving Circles and individuals interested in individual and organizational giving...Network, leverage and enhance the impact of your giving to better our lives and communities.  Ask, guide, tell success stories, find groups & more!

Study Findings: Giving Circles Provide Opportunities, Challenges for Fundraisers (Eikenberry)

Print the article

This entry was posted on 5/17/2007 6:22 AM and is filed under Enhance Impact.

The Association for Fundraising Professionals (AFP) announced in March 2007 that a new study by Angela Eikenberry (February 2007) entitled "Giving Circles and Fundraising in the New Philanthropy Environment:  Final Report" has found that Giving Circles Provide Challenges and Opportunities for Fundraisers

Below are citations from the AFP press release summary of the study's top-level findings as well as suggestions for Giving Circles cited directly from the study.  We welcome your feedback and insight on both to further help enable Giving Circles to become more effective in their relationships with non-profit organizations and the fundraisers who work on their behalf. 

Opportunities:    "Many felt that giving-circle members were open, had a partnership mentality and were interested in learning about the recipient organization and its needs. Nearly all felt that the added value that the giving circle could bring to a relationship--visibility, a voice, appreciation, connections, volunteers, business and mentors, to name a few--could be instrumental for most organizations." (AFP press release, March 2007)

Challenges:  "Others, however, felt that giving circles were not always consistent about their expectations and what was expected in return for funding, and that giving circles were simply not reliable for sustained and long-term funding." (AFP press release, March 2007)

Lessons for Fundraisers:  The lessons (for non-profit organizations seeking funding from Giving Circles) are:

  • "In almost every case involved in the study, the giving circle sought out the charity. In most instances, someone in the giving circle already knew about the organization (and sometimes knew someone at the charity) and proposed that the circle fund the charity. Therefore, if nonprofits want to attract giving circle funding, they most focus on networking, building awareness and public relations. Being able to give presentations and facility tours were cited by several participants, and two individuals interviewed were themselves members of giving circles.
  • Because the giving-circle relationship is often new, fundraisers should expect to spend a significant amount of time on developing it. A fundraiser must be able to adjust quickly to a variety of different personalities within the giving circle. In addition, some participants described some giving-circle funding as "too directive," with members constantly wanting to get involved in different aspects of the charity.
  • Several participants noted that for more formal giving circles sponsored or associated with a host foundation or other organization, there was often a mismatch between the host's priorities and application process and those of the giving circle. The philosophy of giving circles can sometimes clash with the already established board governance structure of their host organization, making it difficult for recipient organizations to navigate the funding process smoothly.
  • It can be difficult to count on giving-circle funding from year to year, since a circle's priorities can change quickly depending upon membership and personalities."  (AFP press release, March 2007)

Suggestions for Giving Circles - Those interviewed by Eikenberry for the study had these suggestions for Giving Circles in enhancing the funding process with non-profit organizations:

- There is a "...need for a clear and transparent process that is as simple as possible".  The "...membership wants to feel involved..." and "...the [non-profit] groups want to feel like they are being treated fairly...", so "...the more transparent the process can be and the more criteria that can be set up to guide the giving and the more that can be said up front... the better it is for both parties." (Eikenberry, February 2007, Pg. 15)

- "It would also be helpful if the giving circle provided support that the nonprofit organization really needs (rather than what the giving circle members think they need). In other words, that the funding is driven by the need of the organization rather than funding that is donor-directed.  For instance, sometimes organizations might be in a stage where they do not need volunteers or have special projects that need to be funded. (Eikenberry, February 2007, Pg. 15)

- "[G]iving for general operating expenses is what is most needed."  One interviewee noted: "A lot of the times they [donors] really want to hear that the money is going for direct services. But be open to give us a break a little bit, to be open to operating, to understand how important it is to have the right people leading the organization and it takes money to pay for one." (Eikenberry, February 2007, Pg. 16) 

- "[T]ake a chance on backing new solutions..." because it "...doesn't have to be the way it's always been..." and so "...when you find solutions that are different paradigms and that work...back them with everything you've got. (Eikenberry, February 2007, Pg. 16)

 - "To this end, giving circle members should see their participation in the giving circle as a first step for their longer-term involvement in supporting organizations and causes they believe in." (Eikenberry, February 2007, Pg. 16)

Note to the reader:  Eikenberry conducted this study to determine the degree to which Giving Circles were impacting philanthropy and based the above on "..interviews with 30 individuals from across the country participating in or working with a giving circle, as well as data from news articles, websites, and other documentation."

We recommend you read the full report as it's full of other great tips and ideas.    Looking forward to your feedback!

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
    Page: 1 of 1
    • 5/17/2007 10:06 PM Linda wrote:
      Our giving circle grants are relatively small ($5000) and have no strings attached. We do request a 1/2 page evaluation at the end of the year, but have tried not to burden our grantees (small nonprofits) with reporting requirements. We do require that the grant fund a specific project. This study pointed out the critical need for grants for operating expenses...something we may consider in the future. I think we avoid a lot of the problems cited in the study by issuing small grants. Perhaps if we had "all our eggs in one basket" we would want more involvement with the grantee's program.

      Given that giving circles are "pass-through" funds by definition, I would think that nonprofits are protected by NOT counting on annual funding from a particular giving circle. Sure, fundraising is easier with a constant revenue stream, but giving circle funds vary from year to year and shouldn't be relied upon. Our giving circle will only fund a particular nonprofit for 3 consecutive years.

      In general, I was disappointed when I read the full text of the study because it highlighted some negative comments by grantees that I believe represent the minority. Just like a business, a nonprofit needs to view their funders as investors or stockholders. A certain amount of work is required to achieve a good relationship. Neither party should unduly burden the other.

      Thankfully, we've had nothing but positive relationships with our grantees.
      Reply to this
      1. 5/18/2007 8:09 AM GCN BLOG Manager wrote:
        Thank you, Linda - For your insight and advice. 

        Your recommendations -- on the importance of a nonprofit viewing their funders as investors and stockholders -- are very helpful, and that - just as the Giving Circle should not unduly burden the nonprofit, the nonprofit should also not unduly burden the Giving Circle, which in many cases may be a less formal organization that the 501c3 nonprofit. 

        While Eikenberry's study certainly helps shed light on aspects of the state of Giving Circle impact in philanthropy and how the overall GC-nonprofit grantee relationship can be enhanced, it is a sample of Giving Circle grantees.  The individual negative and constructive comments (however one views them) coming from the 30 or so interviewees may represent an even smaller percentage of the 30 interviewed and certainly a relatively small percentage of the 220 documented (in 2005) and now estimated 800 GCs nationwide (i.e., a minority as you say).  Researchers such as Eikenberry do try to take the most representative samples possible, but even she addressed the limitations of the study in her report.  She did show how she used the maximum amount of reliable resources to at least achieve the best information available and analysis possible at this stage in the Giving Circle history, so that can be appreciated even if the results may not necessarily be the most representative in all instances, especially in the area of anecdotal results.  It is also sometimes unclear to the reader just how representative some of the specific comments may be, whether they arise from a couple, some or most of interviewees.  So, as you say, it is helpful to keep in perspective to what extent a specific comment may be representative of the broader study or of the larger community, so your point on that is helpful for us all.

        We look forward to when the Giving Circle landscape becomes easier to study for researchers such as Eikenberry and yields increasingly in depth and representative information for all of us.  Hopefully, this study, along with the feedback from Giving Circle members such as yourself, will help continue shaping the landscape and our knowledge in the meantime! 
        Reply to this
    • 5/19/2007 6:16 PM Rebecca wrote:
      I found the article enlightening and shared it with our board. One of the topics up for discussion within our organization is whether to consider operating funds as a category of funding we're willing to support. The California Wellness Foundation (www.tcwf.org) has some great articles and reasoned substantiation as to the measureable benefits such funding can yield. The United Way in our community is changing its focus and many local nonprofits are losing considerable amounts of funding for general operating expenses that had previously been granted by United Way. So, it is a 'hot' topic right now.
      Reply to this
      1. 5/20/2007 4:03 PM GCN BLOG Manager wrote:
        This is helpful for all Giving Circles to know -- about the benefits of funding general operating expenses, the changing focus of the United Way away from them, and why that would then understandably be a hot topic now.  Thanks for your feedback and keep us posted on your findings and Giving Circle decision on this issue!
        Reply to this

    Page: 1 of 1
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.